OC by @merci3@lemmy.world

Single core, 32 bit CPU, can’t even do video playback on VLC. But it kinda works for some offline work, like text editing, and even emulation through zsnes! It’s crazy how Linux keeps old hardware like this running.

Thankfully though, this laptop CPU is upgradable, and so is the ram, so I’m planning on revitalizing and bringing this old Itautec to the 21st century 😄

  • Shareni@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Have you tried antix? It’s basically Debian for old computers.

    Very weird it can’t play videos at all. I installed Linux on a friend’s old <1gb ram laptop and it’s even able to play 480p YouTube.

    Also, I wouldn’t run xfce on it, it’s barely lighter than KDE.

  • LeFantome@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 hours ago

    I was trying to think of the oldest hardware I have run modern Linux on (probably an old Pentium II) when I remembered that I used to run SLS on a 486 (33 MHz, 4 MB of RAM).

  • Unpigged@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Intel 486sx at whooping 33MHz, 4Mb RAM, 650 Mb HDD. Was some Red Hat flavor and took a couple of minutes to launch Netscape Navigator.

  • TXL@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Probably the slowest I’ve used was a 25 MHz(?) sparcstation 1, 500 MB drive, 16 MB RAM. Or some 90’s arm box. Netwinder? iPAQ?

    It’s kind of terrible how huge even tiny distributions are these days. But these days there’s cheap low power draw hardware and big storage available that works great and that’s nice. I don’t miss the bad old times.

    • rc__buggy@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Mine was a SPARCclassic. I had two of them, one ran OpenBSD as the gateway and I put early Gentoo on the other one. It took days to build initially.