This marks a major shift in how the country plans to handle terrorism, especially when it believes such acts are supported or planned from across the border.
They aren’t, they’re blaming Israel for setting the precedent. Now it’s harder for any western country to admonish India because they let Israel do the same thing.
They aren’t, they’re blaming Israel for setting the precedent.
Entirely different situation with two vastly different nations. Shoehorning in a comparison between Israel-Palestine and India-Pakistan situations is odd.
Honestly, it is bold to assume any western country was going to admonish India. India has been courting Western businesses away from China.
I’m not saying they’re going to admonish India, but if they want to, now they have a precedent set where they agreed to an allied nation performing horrific acts against civilians for the sake of rooting out terrorists.
You claiming it to be shoehorning a comparison between the two situations means you fail to comprehend the actual point being made. The point is they are already being lenient about a worst-case scenario like Israel’s genocide that their words will lack power if they ever want to try telling India to stop.
The point is they are already being lenient about a worst-case scenario like Israel’s genocide
Hate to say it, but a nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan is on a whole different level then Israel’s genocide. The entire world has motivation to intervene to stop the nuclear taboo from being broken.
You’re still missing the point, so I’m not gonna argue anymore since it seems like a waste of time. I don’t even disagree with what you said, but its basically you just arguing past the point I’m making.
This is a direct result of israel impunity. Blame everything on terrorism and then do whatever you want.
The only difference is Pakistan isn’t Palestine
Blaming Israel for India’s actions is an interesting choice.
They aren’t, they’re blaming Israel for setting the precedent. Now it’s harder for any western country to admonish India because they let Israel do the same thing.
Entirely different situation with two vastly different nations. Shoehorning in a comparison between Israel-Palestine and India-Pakistan situations is odd.
Honestly, it is bold to assume any western country was going to admonish India. India has been courting Western businesses away from China.
I’m not saying they’re going to admonish India, but if they want to, now they have a precedent set where they agreed to an allied nation performing horrific acts against civilians for the sake of rooting out terrorists.
You claiming it to be shoehorning a comparison between the two situations means you fail to comprehend the actual point being made. The point is they are already being lenient about a worst-case scenario like Israel’s genocide that their words will lack power if they ever want to try telling India to stop.
Hate to say it, but a nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan is on a whole different level then Israel’s genocide. The entire world has motivation to intervene to stop the nuclear taboo from being broken.
Again, two vastly different situations.
You’re still missing the point, so I’m not gonna argue anymore since it seems like a waste of time. I don’t even disagree with what you said, but its basically you just arguing past the point I’m making.
Neg, your point was clear. You are arguing that the West lacks any meaningful power to intervene, because of the perceived lack of action on Israel.
Despite that not being the case at all.
Agreed. Have a good day.