• mean_bean279@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    14 hours ago

    This is highly dependent on the state and even the areas within a state. Here in California for instance we have the Williams Act which lays out a ton of guidance. Some of which impact students paying for things at schools. Some districts in the state view Williams Act and 1:1 Chromebook deployments as being something that the student/parents aren’t responsible for paying for even when they purposefully damage it. This can change though from region to region in the state based on how a districts legal team and its board chooses to read the law since no one so far (at least as far as I was last aware and I work in edtech) has pushed to see where it stops or starts. I’ve worked for districts that were on separate ends of that spectrum and even in the district that made parents pay for damages we still would give them a replacement and not charge them since it was added to a “tab” and only if they wanted transcripts did they have to pay.

    • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      13 hours ago

      That’s fair. In my district your insurance is covered if you qualify for assistance, but intentional damage isn’t included in insurance.

      In my school we will still replace the Chromebook though (barring admin or district saying otherwise), and the financial impact will be fought by others at the district level. It’s above my pay grade.