Germany’s domestic intelligence agency last week classified the largest opposition party, the AfD, as “confirmed right-wing extremist.” This has intensified debates over whether or not to ban the party.

On Friday, the Alternative for Germany (AfD) was classified as “confirmed right-wing extremist” by Germany’s domestic intelligence agency, the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution (BfV).

Now, there has been a first fallout: two AfD politicians and parliamentarians are not allowed to accompany Hesse’s Minister for European affairs, Manfred Pentz, on a trip to Serbia and Croatia. Pentz explained that he could not expect international partners “to sit down at the same table with representatives of a party that has been confirmed as right-wing extremist.”

Further measures also threaten the radical right-wing party: several federal states want to examine whether being a civil servant, including judges, police officers, teachers, or soldiers, is still compatible with being a member of the AfD.

  • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 day ago

    There’s only one political party in German history who banned other political parties. Just because you call a different party a fascist, doesn’t mean you get a pass to act like a fascist.

      • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        That only applies if you are the objective truth. If you are wrong, then it’s just another tool for bigotry, an excuse to ignore other opinions.

      • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Who gets to decide who is a fascist and therefore doesn’t deserve to participate in democracy? What is the criteria for not deserving a voice? How do you define fascist? Maybe I’m cynical, but if you can eliminate popular political opposition by branding them as something, that’s a lot of motivation to brand them.

    • miridius@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      This wouldn’t be a party banning another party, it would be the independent constitutional court

      • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        No the court labeled afd as “confirmed right wing extremist” and someone else decided that that meant they couldn’t participate.

      • OccamsRazer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Yeah you are right. There have been a couple others, but quite a few attempts to ban various parties. I don’t quite understand the system and it’s possible that banning a party there isn’t near as big of a deal as it seems to me. If a party were banned in the united states, it would be very alarming. I think the only party ever banned was the communist party in 1950s, but even that is no longer really in effect.