Da Cap’n@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agoPeople Are Losing Loved Ones to AI-Fueled Spiritual Fantasieswww.rollingstone.comexternal-linkmessage-square181fedilinkarrow-up1424arrow-down120file-text
arrow-up1404arrow-down1external-linkPeople Are Losing Loved Ones to AI-Fueled Spiritual Fantasieswww.rollingstone.comDa Cap’n@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 days agomessage-square181fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareMTK@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·5 hours agoI’ve seen people dumber than ChatGPT, it definitely isn’t sentient but I can see why someone who talks to a computer that they perceive as intelligent would assume sentience.
minus-squareAdrianTheFrog@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 hour agoWe have ai models that “think” in the background now. I still agree that they’re not sentient, but where’s the line? How is sentience even defined?
minus-squarePatch@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 hours agoTuring made a strategic blunder when formulating the Turing Test by assuming that everyone was as smart as he was.
I’ve seen people dumber than ChatGPT, it definitely isn’t sentient but I can see why someone who talks to a computer that they perceive as intelligent would assume sentience.
We have ai models that “think” in the background now. I still agree that they’re not sentient, but where’s the line? How is sentience even defined?
Turing made a strategic blunder when formulating the Turing Test by assuming that everyone was as smart as he was.