Not my title! I do think we are being listened to. And location tracked. And it’s being passed on to advertisers. Is it apple though? Probably not is my take away from this article, but I don’t trust plenty of others, and apple still does

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 days ago

    Instagram showed me an ad for a medical condition I only discussed out loud, in person, in my doctors office.

    Instagram was immediately uninstalled that day.

    • Eager Eagle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 days ago

      Your age group, sex, location, profession/industry, income estimation - you can assume they have this data.

      That + a few data points that could be tracked by apps or websites:

      • Searched online for symptoms
      • Searched for doctors
      • Called the clinic to schedule an appointment
      • GPS to the clinic
      • Connected to the clinic’s WiFi
      • Doctor is a specialist in X

      Cross some of that, personal info, and ads of treatments for conditions of X.

      They don’t need to listen to your mic.

      That said, if it’s a fairly common condition, it might be the case you were presented the ad before and never noticed it.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 days ago

        None of those data points apply. It was nothing I had searched for or spoken to anyone until I saw the doctor that day and the Instagram ad was present by the time I had driven home, specifically mentioning the clinical term mentioned by the doctor.

        It wasn’t even the stated reason for my visit, it was an afterthought at the end of the appointment… “Oh yeah, as long as I’m here, what is this…?”

    • Darorad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      Other methods of data collection can be scarily effective. Stores have identified people were pregnant before they knew.

      Very likely they identified you as someone that could have that condition, and you noticing the ads after talking to your doctor is a form of recency bias.

      You can collect almost all the same data from traditional surveillance methods. Collecting and processing mocrophone data just isn’t effective enough to make up for the massively increased costs from processing it.

      • jordanlund@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        14 days ago

        It displayed the ad before I could get home and research it. It had only been discussed out loud and in person.

              • jordanlund@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                13 days ago

                The wifi was not related to the medical issues, the symptoms, or the specific clinical term mentioned by the doctor.

                • can@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  13 days ago

                  But it’s reasonable to believe other people would have searched the same topic on that network

                  Edit: or even that they looked it up o their own network following connecting to the clinic’s.