In an unexpected mask off “secure” email and VPN provider Proton took the stance of siding with the fascist MAGA Reps. Proton’s services are no option for me and many others any longer. Let’s collect and discuss alternatives (E2E encrypted email and VPN) here 🔐👇

Always try to provide:

-Server location (jurisdiction)

-Governance

-Integrity/trustworthiness/transparency

-User experience/ease of use (grade 1 to 10, lets take Proton as a benchmark with an 8)

-Pricing and links

If you know alternative setups, feel free to share, too.

#ProtonExodus

Background: https://lemmy.ca/comment/13913116

Edit:typo

  • shadejinx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    I think I would wait for changes in their mission and policies before I start moving anything.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    53 minutes ago

    Wow, lots of people on Lemmy just look at screenshots of text and dont read anything anymore.

    I dont think he said anything controversial. Read what he wrote.

    He’s not supporting Trump or the Republican party in general. He is calling them out for selecting someone good on antitrust. That’s not controversial.

    • Maggoty@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      25 minutes ago

      Hi. I see that you’re posting from a Netherlands instance. On the chance that you’re not familiar with how the Republican party operates I’m going to explain. Any department that is seen as being against business gets a person from the business world. They always promise to do a great job, using their business knowledge. And they always do their level best to destroy or neuter that department.

      We are currently at part 2, where they promise to do a great job.

      For the most recent infamous example, check out Ajit Pai. He served in the Bush administration as an Anti Trust lawyer before Trump gave him control of the FCC to blow up net neutrality.

    • frozenspinach@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      20 minutes ago

      Hooo boy, lots to unpack here. The screenshots were screenshots of the post. I’m confused why you would think looking at the screenshots of text somehow amounts to not reading them? In fact, good thing we have those screenshots because the post itself got deleted. Link to screenshot here and also the doubling down screenshots for those who need it.

      Also, are you kidding me? It abso-fudging-lutely was a pretty categorical endorsement of R’s over Dems, at least on the issue of anti-trust in the tech sector. They specifically made a point about how this whole thing amounted to evidence that R’s writ large were more trustworthy than D’s.

      Just a bizarre take all around, especially when tut-tutting about other people supposedly not reading it.

      • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        32 minutes ago

        I’m confused honestly - the post I saw just said that he was happy that Trump picked an anti trust person to break up big tech.

        Why is that bad? Don’t people want the big monopolies broken up?

        • frozenspinach@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 minutes ago

          Again, no! The post was emphatically not just a remark on the nomination being good (why tf do people keep saying that).

          Their comment was an overall assessment of R’s vs D’s and their respective records on regulating the tech sector in general. It rubbed people the wrong way because it’s an obviously crazy revisionist history from someone we all expected would know better.

        • Maggoty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          24 minutes ago

          Because it’s not in good faith. And saying Trump is good for trust busting is revisionist history at best.

  • Tin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The CEO “apologized” this morning (after being duly chastised, I’m sure):

    Hi all, last night, a post from last year from my personal X account suddenly became a topic of discussion here on Reddit. I want to share a few thoughts on this to provide clarity to the community on what is Proton’s policy on politics going forward.

    First, while the X post was not intended to be a political statement, I can understand how it can be interpreted as such, and it therefore should not have been made. While we will not prohibit all employees from expressing personal political opinions publicly, it is something I will personally avoid in the future. I lean left on some issues, and right on other issues, but it doesn’t serve our mission to publicly debate this. It should be obvious, but I will say that it is a false equivalence to say that agreeing with Republicans on one specific issue (antitrust enforcement to protect small companies) is equal to endorsing the entire Republican party platform.

    Second, officially Proton must always be politically neutral, and while we may share facts and analysis, our policy going forward will be to share no opinions of a political nature. The line between facts, analysis, and opinions can be blurry at times, but we will seek to better clarify this over time through your feedback and input.

    The exception to these rules is on the topics of privacy, security, and freedom. These are necessarily political topics, where influencing public policy to defend these values, often requires engaging politically.

    The operations of Proton have always reflected our neutrality. For example, recently we refused pressure to deplatform both Palestinian student groups and Zionist student groups, not because we necessarily agreed with their views, but because we believe more strongly in their right to have their own views.

    It is also a legal guarantee under Swiss law, which explicitly prohibits us from assisting foreign governments or agencies, and allows us no discretion to show favoritism as Swiss law and Swiss courts have the final say.

    The promise we make is that no matter your politics, you will always be welcome at Proton (subject of course to adherence to our terms and conditions). When it comes to defending your right to privacy, Proton will show no favoritism or bias, and will unconditionally defend it irrespective of the opinions you may hold.

    This is because both Proton as a company, and Proton as a community, is highly diverse, with people that hold a wide range of opinions and perspectives. It’s important that we not lose sight of nuance. Agreeing/disagreeing with somebody on one point, rarely means you agree/disagree with them on every other point.

    I would like to believe that as a community there is more that unites us than divides us, and that privacy and freedom are universal values that we can all agree upon. This continues to be the mission of the non-profit Proton Foundation, and we will strive to carry it out as neutrally as possible.

    Going forward, I will be posting via u/andy1011000. Thank you for your feedback and inputs so far, and we look forward to continuing the conversation.

    Original post: https://www.reddit.com/r/ProtonMail/comments/1i2nz9v/on_politics_and_proton_a_message_from_andy/

    Am I being paranoid when I notice that the binary at the end of his username translates to 88?

    • nepenthes@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      26 minutes ago

      Someone in the comments there make a good point:

      It is so disingenuous to say “last year” when it was a little more than a month ago.

      His excuse that the social media team posted it from the official account instead of his account is farcical. This whole thing is too bad a taste in my mouth.

    • frozenspinach@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 minutes ago

      First, while the X post was not intended to be a political statement

      Not intended to be a political statement? Even setting aside agreement vs disagreement, how is this (below) not a political statement?

      10 years ago Republicans were the party of big business and Dems stood for the little guys, but today the tables have completely turned.

      Again, regardless of whether you agree or disagree it’s like a textbook example of a political statement.

    • Poop@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Not defending the 88, he could be a racist, but he’s apparently from Taiwan. It is a common number in Chinese culture, guessing Taiwan too. Where I live there have been a couple of businesses with “88” in the name and both were Chinese.

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/88_(number)

    • fastfomo7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      No, 88 is not a bad number. “88” is pronounced like “發發” in Taiwanese, which means ‘making fortune’. And you might also see Taiwanese people using “168” in their usernames, as it has similar meaning.

        • fastfomo7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          22 minutes ago

          Sure, it could be. I wasn’t defending him.
          Just please don’t think most of us using “88” or “888” for hinting Nazis, and “666” for praying Satan.

          • frozenspinach@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            5 minutes ago

            Well, like anything, it depends on context. In this context, it’s not crazy to be on high alert for weird politicized signals.

            However, I think you made a pretty good point about its meaning in Taiwan given that this fellow is apparently from there, combined with it being his year of birth. So, context decides and in this case at least it seems pretty ordinary.

          • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 minutes ago

            For sure. Context absolutely matters, ans the context here doesn’t establish a pattern from my understanding. So in this case it’s unlikely to be a dog whistle.

            But people should still be aware of what the 88/1448 dog whistle looks like.

      • LotrOrc@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        30 minutes ago

        Not really outside of the west. He’s Taiwanese i believe and 88 is considered fairly auspicious

    • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Honestly it’s more fucking cringe when these clowns try to walk back their opinion in a clearly bullshit and artificial way. I rather them just own it. If you’re gonna be a cuck, be a cuck. Don’t backtrack.

  • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I’ve been very happy with disroot.org, but you have to do your own encryption (I use Thunderbird).

    I think I pay $10 per year for 5 GB, but they have a free plan.

  • sadTruth@lemmy.hogru.ch
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    4 hours ago

    There are 2 kinds of companies:

    1. Evil companies
    2. Companies that are not evil YET.

    What this means in this case is that only your own E-Mail server running on a Raspi in your own home can be considered private or secure in the long run. Unfortunately this is really really hard to do, which is the only reason i have not done it yet.
    Personally i do not consider any E-Mail private, because E-Mail is not E2E-encrypted, and 99.9% of times one side of the conversation is going to be hosted on some shady companies servers.

    Of course Proton delivers a great service, because they make an insecure protocol a little less insecure, and i personally use Proton mail. Unfortunately their closed-source nature makes it impossible to switch providers without abandoning their great software.

    As for services like Drive, they can actually be hosted privately and securely on your own Raspi with stuff like NextCloud/OwnCloud.
    For those that can’t/don’t want to self-host, i would recommend paying for a hoster that hosts FOSS software and contributes to it either with money or code. In that case you would probably loose E2E-encryption, but gain the ability to switch providers once your provider turns on you. In that case at least some of your money would continue to offer value to you by having improved the software you are still using.

    • frozenspinach@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      5 minutes ago

      I think the only thing you can trust is software architecture - things like E2E encryption, zero knowledge architecture, auditable code etc.

    • spookedintownsville@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      41 minutes ago

      I only use Proton for Email and Calendar and self host everything else since I don’t trust myself to run an email server properly.

      • John@lemmygrad.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        58 minutes ago

        “non-profit” is just a tax designation, and the companies are still money/profit-driven. I don’t think non-profits are inherently bad, they’re just working within the system for what they perceive as good. In the non-profit my partner works at, the CEO makes $421,968 / year. While not billionaire status, it’s still 7x what my partner makes at the company. It’s exploitative in the Socialist sense.

        I’m just saying, being a “non-profit” (misleading term at best) doesn’t necessarily mean the company is “good” or that the mission is “good”.

        • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          49 minutes ago

          I dont see a problem with that. Its nonprofit. The money is going to a laborer, not to investors who dont do work for the org. People deserve salaries. $500k year is reasonable if the org is doing well.

          • John@lemmygrad.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            40 minutes ago

            I don’t feel (and neither would a lot of Leftists) that a 7x salary for a CEO is fair. People deserve to be compensated for the work that they do, of course … but does the CEO do 7x the work of other people in the company?

  • Roopappy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’ve been doing research into this because I want to degoogle. Looking for hosted and secure Mail, Calendar, Drive… maybe docs if possible. I don’t mind paying as long as I’m a customer and not a product to be sold.

    My short list was: Mailbox.org, Zoho, and Notion.

    Then there are the services I don’t understand as much because I don’t really want to self host or step into server maintenance… NextCloud, OwnCloud, LibreCloud, OnlyOffice. Maybe someone could straighten me out with those if I’m off base.

  • c1a5s1c@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    33 minutes ago

    Maybe not the contribution that you’re looking for, but going to tell you this story regardless.

    I am Swiss, and am a former Department of Foreign Affairs (FDFA / EDA) employee. My colleagues and I had organized an evening on cybersecurity, where we showcase what Switzerland has to offer. I invited stakeholders such as:

    • Dreamlab (really cool company, should look them up if you don’t know of them)
    • NCSC (Swiss National Cyber Security Center)
    • Some Swiss cyber regulator; and
    • Proton

    Firstly, when speaking to a delegate of one of the above listed (don’t feel comfortably sharing publicly which one), he ushered a statement; upon me saying I’m a huge Proton fan and subscribed to all services - “they are lying to your faces”.

    I was curious, so I spoke with the regulators and NCSC delegates, they said that Proton has been involved in a handful of leaks - some that were made public, some behind the scenes.

    When I spoke to Andy, having told him that I grew up in Canada, I asked him what his plan was for North America. His response: “I will gladly take their money, but never open up shop there - too many national security departments that come knocking on the door”.

    Now I see that (on the Proton page), that they are looking for a few US based positions for Marketing and Growth - going against what we discussed a few years back. In all honesty, I still have a Plus subscription with them, but beginning to questions a lot more things regarding security and ethics at Proton. Guess I’ll just self-host in the future. Trust no one but yourself with your personal data.

  • chloroken@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I personally don’t care. If their code changes, I’m out, but this shit is par for course. Capitalists are largely all capable of these decisions.

    • DozensOfDonner@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      Yeah, I agree. Lotta good points here, maybe the guy is a jerk, maybe an not-thought-out post, idk. If they start screwing with the actual service, that’s an easy signal and I’d be out too.

  • Doomsider@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Remember when businesses stayed the fuck out of politics so they didn’t alienate their customers because they like money? Pepperidge Farms remembers.

    • ZeroOne@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Taking a neutral stance is also political;<br> Also when people say that “they don’t like politics in X,Y&Z” they mean politics that they don’t agree with

    • Ferk@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Is “staying out of politics” even possible for a company?

      I feel even just the creation of a company already has political repercussions (and I don’t mean that as in them being necessarily bad).

  • Nicro@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I’m currently on Tuta, because I can’t imagine Mail without a free tier. It’s run out of Germany(EU). Its 3€ a month for the normal tier, free takes away most features. Like Proton, you need to use their (OSS)-Client, for encryption reasons. It’s currently growing and I hope they don’t go crazy anytime soon.

    I was looking at Posteo, but I don’t want my entire internet identity to be gone, if I ever can’t pay for it.

  • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Thank fuck I didn’t get that subscription, I was looking into getting a secure mail service. I engaged with people calling proton a CIA honeypot, investigating what was up with the rumors and I was about to jump into bed with proton.

    • filcuk@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I am trying to understand this too… I don’t care about the CEO’s personal opinions, so long as Proton provide the service they promised.
      I’d be happy if someone would ELI5 as to why I’m wrong, I’m too lazy to switch otherwise.

      • Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        3 hours ago

        A CEO/founder of a communications company praising a fascist is gonna be a major concern of a privacy focused community like this.

        Proton should be doing everything they can to keep things private, since that’s they’re whole marketing strategy. Yet here they are licking the boot. That makes them untrustworthy of our data.

      • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        If yhe person running the show shows poor judgment in whose company they keep, where else have they had poor judgement?

  • jokeyrhyme@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I know Google just donated to Trump’s inauguration, and also does all the stupid surveillance capitalism crap that Google does, but I just compared prices, and Google Workspace is a few dollars per month cheaper per user than Proton is, for my needs (family, custom domain names, etc)

    We’ve been on Proton for a few years, and it’s fine, but we do also have Pixel Android phones, and not using Google services constantly feels like swimming upstream, plus all family members also still end up having to use Google services for work, anyway

    It’s just not practical for me to de-Google, which is a shame, so I think I’ll be switching in a few months, unless pricing changes significantly :S

    • frozenspinach@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 minutes ago

      I think it’s a good special case thing but I don’t think you’re intended to host tons of stuff there as a primary account

    • jagged_circle@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      This. There’s a bunch of great tech collectives out there. Unfortunately many require invite links. Disroot is one that lets anyone signup.