• NateNate60@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    118
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Unlike what the title would suggest, the “moving to Texas” part was basically immaterial to the company’s failure.

    They never had any product to ship to begin with and were basically subsisting on loans and venture capital money to continue bullshitting with a theoretical product. Add in some dodgy regulatory practices resulting in fines from the Government and questionable business practices. When the funding dried up, they withered like a sponge in the California (or Texas) sun.

    • adarza@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      4 days ago

      perhaps the move to a human-hostile environment such as texas cost them some good employees.

      • NateNate60@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 days ago

        The entire point of my comment was to indicate that this had seemingly little to no impact on the company’s success. Even the best employees in the world can’t save a company that is shipping no product and run by idiots.

      • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Reading the article, that doesn’t seem to have had the slightest impact on this. They tanked because of shitty and sketchy management

      • ABCDE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 days ago

        The person already said it wasn’t because of that, no need to “perhaps” by disregarding the effort they went to.

  • Brickfrog@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    In August, Canoo moved its headquarters from Torrance, Calif., to Justin, Texas — asking 137 of the office’s 194 employees to relocate, while cutting the remaining staff.

    Yikes, not great for all those employees that moved their entire lives out to TX just to get laid off. They weren’t even working in TX long enough to qualify for unemployment. Hopefully they were getting paid enough to deal with relocation and maybe have enough saved up to get the hell out of TX after this.

    • mojofrododojo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      imagine asking the women you work with, and your colleague’s spouses and daughters:

      “Hey, let’s uproot everything and move to uterightsbannedistan, er, Texas, where a pregnancy complication could easily kill any of you, but the corporation will save LOADS!”

      fucking chodes

    • stoly@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      3 days ago

      They can still get CA unemployment because they would have worked through eligible periods prior to their moves. I had similar happen when I moved to Louisiana and got laid off. The guy at the unemployment office told me to apply in CA instead because the rate would be higher.

        • stoly@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          You are eligible for any state you worked in during the applicable period. It’ doesn’t matter if you still live there.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          edit-2
          3 days ago

          You said the economy has a valuation problem. That doesn’t make sense, since the economy is about jobs and trade, not about valuations. The stock market (including public and private markets) is about valuations.

          • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            Valuation allows for borrowing. If a company can determine it’s worth to a potential lender by using it’s valuation, which we agree is under the markets domain, then they are now hand in hand. If you can borrow against valuation they cannot be exclusive.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              3 days ago

              Sure, and that’s a stock market issue (broadly speaking), not an economic one. Someone losing their shirt for investing stupidly is not indicative of an economic failure, but of a valuation failure.

              Valuation problems can lead to economic problems if it’s widespread enough, such as with the .com or RE market collapses, but they can also be pretty isolated and have minimal impact. Intel’s valuation, for example, has been cut to almost a third (not by a third, but to a third), and that hasn’t triggered or indicated much of anything in the economy, it’s just Intel failing over and over to live up to their valuation. Yeah, jobs get cut (economic indicator) when there’s a huge discrepancy w/ valuation, but they also tend to get created at other orgs as they snap up the business left behind by the failing company.

              The economy and the market are certainly related and linked, but they’re not the same thing. An economic collapse usually causes or is caused by a market collapse and vice versa, but not always, especially if it’s isolated to a sector like we see with AI. If everyone completely 180s on AI, it’s not going to change the jobs landscape much, but it will cause a lot of valuation corrections throughout the tech industry. Companies like Microsoft and Nvidia will be fine since they have other core businesses, but companies like OpenAI won’t be nearly as resilient since that’s their entire business. Likewise, financial companies investing in AI companies will also likely be fine, provided they have a sufficiently diversified portfolio.

          • thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            the US Dollar is partly based on value. The value of American ingenuity and brands, and the dollar availability and acceptability.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              3 days ago

              The US dollar, or any currency, isn’t the economy either. Look at the recent bout of inflation we had, unemployment remained pretty steady despite relatively extreme rate hikes.

              The US dollar is based on supply, which impacts relative value. It’s all interconnected, but central banks can manage inflation/deflation regardless of what happens to the economy.

  • kata1yst@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 days ago

    Writing was on the wall after they lost their Amazon and USPS bids. Their entire model was based on landing fleet contracts.

  • karpintero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    4 days ago

    I was hoping their truck or lifestyle vehicle would make it to market, but yeah they had a steep hill to climb with all the turmoil surrounding the company, scaling production, and the change in political winds now being essentially hostile to EV manufacturers.

    In August, Canoo moved its headquarters from Torrance, Calif., to Justin, Texas — asking 137 of the office’s 194 employees to relocate, while cutting the remaining staff.

    Moving wasn’t going to save the company so why uproot your employees only to fold 5 months later

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 days ago

      There’s a reason why vehicles look the way they do, and why EVs and ICE vehicles look similar, and it’s because that’s what customers want.

      I look very suspiciously at a car company whose product looks radically different from everyone else.

  • Xanthrax@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    Does anyone else only remember their dream if they’re lucid dreaming, but for some reason, it immediately wakes you up when you realize you’re lucid dreaming?

    Edit: WRONG POST